In celebration of my new release, Seduction's Stakes, this week I am running a series of contests. It's a week-long game, and the person with the most correct answers at the end of the week will receive an autographed copy of the book. Some of these require actual reading of the book.
You may comment at any time -- the questions are open for the duration of the contest.
Please leave your answers in the comments section.
So first up!
Which Thoroughbred Legends rivalry does the rivalry in Seduction’s Stakes parallel?
Have fun!
Claire
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
A bit about the story:
Never make a wager you can’t afford to lose...
A member of horse racing’s elite, Maddie McCleery’s got her eye on the Triple Crown and her heart set on her rival’s unraced colt. Owned by the one man she can’t conquer on the track, the same man who humiliated her in a youthful game of Truth or Dare, the colt promises sweet victory. When he refuses her purchase offer, and outruns her at the Kentucky Derby, Maddie sets out to seduce Riley into selling. In the process, she’s seduced, and agrees to a shocking bet. The odds aren’t in her favor, and she’s desperate for the win.
Riley Jennings wants Maddie almost more than the Triple Crown. In his bed, in his shower – wherever he can have her. For two years she’s eluded him and he’s refused her offer on his horse out of spite. Enraptured by her post-Derby game, he learns the lengths she’ll go to for his colt, and sees sure-fire victory. His proposed wager stacks the odds in his favor – if her horse wins the Preakness, he’ll accept her terms. If his horse comes in first, they’ll negotiate his way.
But when the dust settles on the wire just how deep is the winning purse?
While you're waiting, if you want to know Riley a little more, hop on over to author Linda Kage's blog -- she interviewed him this morning!
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
Seduction's Stakes is available for Pre-order through The Wild Rose Press.
According to the UPS Site I should have my copies in my hot little hands today, and I'm so excited I can't sit still. Just wish that doorbell would ring a little faster.
I'm planning a few contests out, and am now scrounging for different types of prizes. It's going to be a fun next couple of weeks.
Meanwhile, pounding away at a paranormal series and trying to keep busy until The Big Release Day.
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
Well, it's almost October 2nd, which means Seduction's Stakes is almost here!
This week it finally hit me ... my first book is going to come out. And wow, that's kinda scary when I stopped to think about it. I planned for September to be a month of different marketing strategies locally, but now that I'm getting started, I'm realizing: "Wow, I need to do this. I ought to do that. If I could, I'd love to do this too!"
From updating websites, to redesigning pages so the book can be purchased from my site, to passing out promotional materials, to ordering different materials (and wishing I could order still others), to talking to store managers about different launches, to xyz... I'm a bit in a whirlwind.
Linda Kage sent a request for an interview, and I think that's what drove it home. I've been an author. But now I'm about to be an author.
From here, I'm going to have to keep rolling with All I Want For Christmas... Is Big Blue Eyes around the corner in December, and Timeless Valentine coming out the day after my son's birthday in January -- sheesh! If the holiday months are this busy, I think I'm going to miss the holiday itself.
Anyway. It's almost time. Here's the excerpt if you want a sneek peak. Excerpt:
~Claire
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
Last evening, on Twitter, Literary Agent Colleen Lindsay had a brief Ask an Agent session, and I posed the question to her, "If a client wants to write something you don't represent, do you collaborate in-house or part ways?"
Her response wasn't exactly what I expected. But it did make me stop and think. She said it depends, because sometimes shifting may not be in the client's best interests career-wise.
Many of us, myself included, dabble with more than one genre. Some assume other pen names to accomplish writing in different areas of interest. You'll see a lot of this when authors write erotica -- they like to keep their identities separate, and this makes sense to me since so much of erotica carries an unfortunate stigma amongst other non-erotic readers.
But Ms. Lindsay made me think about how it might be detrimental to a career, and I must confess I hadn't quite ever considered that side of the coin.
Now, I am just musing at this point -- we discussed nothing further so don't run off thinking she said anything along these lines:
I wonder if the same impact applies to writing different genres of Romance? I can't see that being as large of a factor as say writing romance and then leaping into say, horror. In romance, there are basic essentials across all genres. You master them, then switching a genre becomes a matter of understanding the audience's desires, the specifics related to the new genre, and satisfying all those factors along with a plot, period.
I also have to wonder if the career impact becomes more of a factor not necessarily with the desire to switch, and perhaps successfully selling the new genre to a publishing house, but when the final numbers come in. If sales are poor in the new genre -- bad career move. Might impact sales on your first genre from that point forward. If sales are good in the new genre -- successful career move? Or would you then, if your sales were better in the second genre than the first, be pigeon-holed in an area and expected to write what may not be your primary passion?
It's an interesting subject, and one I would urge everyone considering writing more than one "flavor" to give thought. It sure gives me a new perspective on some of the ideas I was tinkering with long-term wise.
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
Well, as I finish up the final round edits for Timeless Valentine, I'm left thinking about the author/editor relationship. I've heard several true horror stories from people in my RWA Chapter, about friends of theirs who are true divas. It makes me wonder, what propensity of the author population actually carries on in this fashion?
My relationships with my editors are smooth. If I have a question, I ask. They don't hesitate to answer. If they want me to change something, I consider what they are asking and weigh the question: "Do I want to be published, or do I want to be picky?"
Rarely does that take much considering. Therefore, when my editor asks me to change something, nine times out of ten I do so unquestioningly. If I have a hesitation, I try to discover what the editor is looking for, see if there's a middle ground without blowing it up into an issue. (Shoot! I get nervous even asking for further details, I'm certainly not going to bicker with someone who holds my book's fate in their hands.)
More often than not, the comment ends up being a moot point and either I change it without pause, or my editor decides it's not worth messing with.
I cannot imagine the relationship between author and editor being drastically different. Editors are here to help our books become better than what we already feel is "perfect". I can't imagine rooting my heels in and having trivial arguements just for the sake of maintaining every actual word I put in.
But I guess some folks don't feel that way. They feel the editor should be grateful to them, I suppose. Or something equally as full of drivel.
So, note to authors...
Folks, its in our best opinions to do what our editors want of us. We have to trust that our editors came to hold their position because of their knowledge. Questioning everything they want isn't the best way to make you look easy to work with. Pick your battles. Find out what is most important to you, and know what about your book you're unwilling to compromise on. If you can make every other correction the editor desires, and you politely challenge one issue, they are more likely to work with you than if you complain and groan about everything.
Edits aren't fun. Even editors know this. But folks, these folks aren't out to ruin your book. They are out to make it the best book the market can support. And in so doing, hopefully, bring in your dollars.
~Claire
www.claireashgrove.com
www.toristclaire.com
"Victorians used the term 'limbs' as a euphenism for legs, which were thought to be so sexually exciting to a man, even a glimpse of a table leg could incite him to sexual frenzy. Table skirts were invented to prevent any unnatural unions between men and furniture."
~(History Channel International)
